![]() Similarly, I could'nt show sponteneous activation (e.g.: human actor, or timer related activation). In such a usage it can be ok to use the syntax in a less strict form. For example in this diagram, if I would shorten the server lifebar to end in the part, in order to show succesive lifebars triggered by incomming messages, I couldn't resume the server lifebar in the bloc. Obviously you are using the sequence diagram as an analysis tool, not a design tool. This prevents me from showing different sets of interactions in the different alternatives of my combined element. Problem 2: I have an additional question: it seems not possible to add a lifebar without adding an incomming message. It is similar to alt with only one trace. Version ? Or if this design is on purpose and will not be changed ? Optional: If the supplied condition is true, only then the fragments will execute. Solution to this issue ? Or if it’s a known bug that will be corrected in a future Please f ind here a attached the test model an here a screenshot ![]() In this video you will learn about various constru. This issueĬauses important information on the diagram to be hidden by less important lifebars. Sequence Diagram is an Interaction diagram, which shows the message communication between various Objects. Select first an element where a new Use Case Diagram to be contained as a child. Moveįorward or backward of the visual elements has no effect on this. Problem 1: In sequence diagrams, combinedįragments are always overlapped by lifebars.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |